A Critical Review of The Jordanian Legal Frameworks on International Cooperation in Combating Cybercrime

Authors

Huthaifa Albustanji, Paulovics Anita

 

Abstract

Jordan has seen a significant rise in cybercrime over the past decade, highlighting the need for stronger international cooperation. This study aims to strengthen Jordanian authorities’ efforts to adhere to the most prominent international conventions on cybercrime, particularly the Budapest Convention. Using a disciplinary normative approach, the study examines Jordan’s current legal frameworks, identifying gaps in jurisdiction, extradition, mutual legal assistance, and cross-border digital evidence handling. The analysis reveals that Jordan’s reliance on the Arab Convention on Combating Information Technology Crime, enacted in 2010, is inadequate due to the evolving nature of cybercrimes. Despite efforts to foster regional and global collaboration, Jordan’s non-participation in the Budapest Convention limits its effectiveness. The study concludes that aligning Jordan’s legal framework with international conventions (e.g., the Budapest Convention) and strengthening national legislation are crucial for combating cybercrime.